Although advancements in today’s technology appear user-friendly, many voters are wary of how those in government offices are using software to access their personal information. The fear of such government overreach has prompted lawmakers to conduct a data privacy audit, specifically within law enforcement.
State Auditor Elaine Howle was asked by lawmakers to initiate the investigation that would look into the ways law enforcement agencies use license plate reading technology. The information gained by local police departments has been shared with other authorities, including Border Patrol.
Despite the concerns, many disagree with the audit taking place. During the hearing, Assemblyman Randy Voepel was seen shaking his phone in the air, claiming that no information is entirely private in today’s day and age. Voepel subsequently voted against the proposed audit.
As technology continues to improve and the current trends persist, voter privacy will inevitably diminish. The audit proposed by State Senator Scott Wiener will be a waste of time and resources by the Democratic Party. The audit is being sold as a measure to protect voters against masked surveillance, but in reality this software allows law enforcement to complete their jobs at a higher standard. Allowing local law enforcement agencies to share information, especially with Border Patrol, is necessary for officers to respond to reports in a timely fashion.
License plate reading technology and the sharing of information between police stations will benefit local communities by reducing crime rates. While law enforcement should be held accountable for how they use such data, lawmakers should not prohibit officers from completing their jobs.
